Skip to content

Warning

CII-SR-279: Do not name a buyer requisitioner in the invoice header

In short

Warning: worth checking.

CII-SR-279 means the invoice names a requisitioner, the person or department at the buyer who asked for the goods, and the invoice standard has no place for one. Remove it and use the buyer reference or the purchase order number to point to that request.

On this page

What it means

The invoice header contains a BuyerRequisitionerTradeParty element, which names the person or department at the buyer who requested the purchase. EN 16931 has no such party. It uses references instead: the buyer reference (BT-10) and the purchase order number (BT-13).

Why it matters

This is only a warning, so the file is still accepted. The requisitioner has no field in the EN 16931 data model, so the buyer's software will not read it. The buyer matches the invoice by its references, not by this party.

How to fix it

Look for a requested by, requisitioner or internal contact field on the invoice in your invoicing software and stop it being exported. Ask the buyer which reference they want on the invoice, usually a buyer reference or a purchase order number, and enter it in those fields. This is worth fixing if the buyer uses that name to route the invoice internally.

The rule as published

BuyerRequisitionerTradeParty should not be present

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (CII) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (CII) 3.0.2
NLCIUS (CII) 1.0.3.13
France CTC (CII) 1.4.0-04
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether CII-SR-279 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026