Skip to content

Warning

CII-SR-350: Do not name a separate invoicing party

In short

Warning: worth checking.

CII-SR-350 means the invoice has an InvoicerTradeParty block, a party that issues the invoice when that is not the seller, which EN 16931 does not use. Delete the block and make sure the seller details name the right business.

On this page

What it means

The invoice-level settlement section (ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement) holds an InvoicerTradeParty block. In the underlying syntax it names the party that issues the invoice when that differs from the seller. EN 16931 only knows the seller (BG-4), so the rule expects the block to be absent.

Why it matters

This is a warning, so the file is still accepted. Receivers read the seller and the buyer and ignore a separate invoicer, so a party that appears only in this block is missing from the buyer's records. It is worth fixing when a billing service or group company fills the block with details that differ from the seller's.

How to fix it

Delete the InvoicerTradeParty block. Then open the seller details (BG-4) and check that they show the business that supplied the goods or services, with its name, address and VAT number. If a billing service or group company sends invoices for you, there is no place for its details in an EN 16931 invoice.

The rule as published

InvoicerTradeParty should not be present

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (CII) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (CII) 3.0.2
NLCIUS (CII) 1.0.3.13
France CTC (CII) 1.4.0-04
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether CII-SR-350 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026