Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-398: Leave out the contact details of the delivery party

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-398 means the delivery party has contact details (cac:Contact), which EN 16931 does not use there. Remove cac:Contact from cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty. If the delivery contact details need to remain on the invoice, put them in the invoice note (BT-22).

On this page

What it means

This rule looks at the delivery party (cac:DeliveryParty), the party the goods or services go to, in the delivery information of a UBL invoice or credit note. It checks that the party has no cac:Contact, which holds a contact name, telephone number and email address. EN 16931 has contact details only for the seller (BG-6) and the buyer (BG-9).

Why it matters

EN 16931 defines contact fields for the seller (BG-6) and the buyer (BG-9), not for the delivery party.

How to fix it

Omit the delivery party's contact block from your invoice export. If the delivery contact matters, add it to the invoice note (BT-22). Use the buyer contact (BG-9) only if the details also belong to the buyer's contact. If you build the XML yourself, delete cac:Contact from cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty. Recheck the exported file.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty Contact

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-398 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026