Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-399: Leave out the person details of the delivery party

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-399 means the delivery party has a person details block (cac:Person), which EN 16931 does not use. Remove that block from cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty, and give the name of the delivery party (BT-70) if you need it.

On this page

What it means

This rule looks at the delivery party (cac:DeliveryParty), the party the goods or services go to, in the delivery information of a UBL invoice or credit note. It checks that the party has no cac:Person, which holds details of an individual, such as first and family name or job title. EN 16931 only has the name of the delivery party (BT-70).

Why it matters

EN 16931 uses the delivery party name (BT-70), not a cac:Person block containing separate personal details.

How to fix it

Change your invoice export so it omits cac:Person from the delivery party. If you need to name the delivery party, use the delivery party name (BT-70). If you build the XML yourself, delete cac:Person from cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty and use cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty/cac:PartyName/cbc:Name for BT-70. Recheck the exported file.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty Person

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-399 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026