What it means
The check looks at the party the goods are delivered to (cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty) and warns when it contains a cac:FinancialAccount, a bank account belonging to that party. Payment account details are separate, for example the account to pay into in the bank transfer details (BG-17).
Why it matters
EN 16931 does not use cac:FinancialAccount under the delivery party. This rule warns when that element is present, independently of the payment account details.
How to fix it
Delete cac:FinancialAccount from cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty in your XML export. The account your customers pay into is separate and stays in your payment details. Export the corrected file and check it again.
Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931
Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice
The rule as published
A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty FinancialAccount Where this rule applies
| Rule set | Version |
|---|---|
| EN 16931 (UBL) | 1.3.17 |
| EN 16931 (UBL credit note) | 1.3.17 |
| XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) | 3.0.2 |
| XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) | 3.0.2 |
| Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) | 2026.5 |
| Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) | 2026.5 |
| SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) | 2.0.3.13 |
| SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) | 2.0.3.13 |
| France CTC (UBL invoice) | 1.4.0-04 |
| France CTC (UBL credit note) | 1.4.0-04 |
| CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 | 1.0.9 |
| CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 | 1.0.9 |
Check your file
Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-403 still fails, and which other rules do.
Related rules
- UBL-CR-404 The delivery should not name a party to notify
- UBL-CR-405 The delivery should not contain despatch details
- UBL-CR-406 The delivery should not contain delivery terms
- UBL-CR-407 The delivery should not contain a minimum delivery unit
- UBL-CR-408 The delivery should not contain a maximum delivery unit
- UBL-CR-409 The delivery should not contain shipment details