What it means
The test checks that the line's ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct, representing item information (BG-31), has no direct ram:SubBrandName child. It does not prohibit the same wording in the supported product information fields.
Why it matters
EN 16931 does not use a separate ram:SubBrandName field in this part of the CII invoice. Relevant range or sub-brand information can be retained in the supported name, description or attribute fields.
How to fix it
Remove ram:SubBrandName from the exported product details. Retain any useful wording in ram:Name (BT-153), ram:Description (BT-154) or an item attribute (BG-32). Export the revised file and check it again.
Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931
Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice
The rule as published
SubBrandName should not be present Where this rule applies
| Rule set | Version |
|---|---|
| EN 16931 (CII) | 1.3.17 |
| XRechnung 3.0 (CII) | 3.0.2 |
| NLCIUS (CII) | 1.0.3.13 |
| France CTC (CII) | 1.4.0-04 |
Check your file
Drop your e-invoice to see whether CII-SR-059 still fails, and which other rules do.
Related rules
- CII-SR-060 Remove the separate drained net weight element
- CII-SR-061 Remove the variable measure indicator element
- CII-SR-062 Remove the separate colour code element
- CII-SR-063 Remove the separate colour description element
- CII-SR-064 Leave Designation out of a line's product details
- CII-SR-065 Leave out the announced cancellation date