Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-442: The type of the account to be debited is not used

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-442 warns that your UBL invoice or credit note includes an account type code (cbc:AccountTypeCode) on the account to be debited under a payment mandate. Remove that element from the XML and recheck the file.

On this page

What it means

This rule checks that cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PaymentMandate/cac:PayerFinancialAccount contains no cbc:AccountTypeCode element. An empty element also triggers the warning.

Why it matters

EN 16931 does not use an account type code at this location in the UBL payment details.

How to fix it

Remove cbc:AccountTypeCode from cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PaymentMandate/cac:PayerFinancialAccount. Keep the account identifier (BT-91) in cbc:ID; this rule does not require you to replace it with an IBAN. Save or re-export the XML and recheck it in Klarbon.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the PaymentMeans PaymentMandate PayerFinancialAccount AccountTypeCode

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-442 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026