Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-015: The document-level invoicing period should not have a free-text description

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-015 means a document-level invoicing period contains a description (cbc:Description), which EN 16931 does not use. Remove it, and put the explanation in the invoice note if it matters.

On this page

What it means

The rule checks that cac:InvoicePeriod directly under the invoice or credit note root has no cbc:Description. This is not the same as cbc:DescriptionCode in the same block, which carries the VAT point date code (BT-8) and is not checked by this rule.

Why it matters

EN 16931's UBL rules exclude a free-text description from the document-level invoicing period. The VAT point date code (BT-8) is a separate field.

How to fix it

Delete cbc:Description inside the document-level cac:InvoicePeriod. If you want to describe the period in words, put the sentence in the invoice note (BT-22), and keep any dates in cbc:StartDate and cbc:EndDate. Do not remove cbc:DescriptionCode if you use it for the VAT point date. Export again and recheck the file.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the InvoicePeriod Description

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-015 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026