What it means
The test checks that the line's ram:SpecifiedTradeProduct, representing item information (BG-31), has no direct ram:EndItemName child. It does not check the wording of the name.
Why it matters
EN 16931 does not use a separate ram:EndItemName field in this part of the CII invoice. The invoiced product's own name belongs in the item name (BT-153).
How to fix it
Remove ram:EndItemName from the exported product details. Keep the invoiced product's own name in ram:Name (BT-153). Put any useful additional information in ram:Description (BT-154) or an item attribute (BG-32). Export the revised file and check it again.
Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931
Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice
The rule as published
EndItemName should not be present Where this rule applies
| Rule set | Version |
|---|---|
| EN 16931 (CII) | 1.3.17 |
| XRechnung 3.0 (CII) | 3.0.2 |
| NLCIUS (CII) | 1.0.3.13 |
| France CTC (CII) | 1.4.0-04 |
Check your file
Drop your e-invoice to see whether CII-SR-055 still fails, and which other rules do.
Related rules
- CII-SR-056 Remove the separate area density element
- CII-SR-057 Remove the separate product use description
- CII-SR-058 Remove the separate brand name element
- CII-SR-059 Remove the separate sub-brand name element
- CII-SR-060 Remove the separate drained net weight element
- CII-SR-061 Remove the variable measure indicator element