Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-677: The account to be debited must not have a scheme attribute

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-677 means the account to be debited in a direct debit (BT-91) has a scheme attribute (schemeID), which EN 16931 does not use. It is a warning; remove the schemeID from the account number.

On this page

What it means

When an invoice is paid by direct debit, it can show the buyer's account that will be debited (BT-91), normally an IBAN. In UBL that is cbc:ID inside cac:PaymentMandate/cac:PayerFinancialAccount. EN 16931 treats it as a plain identifier with no scheme. This rule checks that this cbc:ID has no schemeID attribute, for example schemeID="IBAN".

Why it matters

This is a warning. It is worth fixing when your export adds it to every direct debit invoice.

How to fix it

In your invoicing software, check the direct debit settings and enter only the account number, with no account type or scheme next to it. If your export still writes a scheme, update the software or export in the standard EN 16931 or Peppol BIS format. If you build the XML yourself, delete the schemeID attribute from cbc:ID in cac:PaymentMandate/cac:PayerFinancialAccount.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the PayerFinancialAccount/ID schemeID

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-677 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026