Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-552: A line discount or charge should not have an identifier

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-552 means a discount or charge on an invoice line has an identifier (cbc:ID), which EN 16931 does not use. Remove the identifier and describe the discount or charge by its reason and amount.

On this page

What it means

The rule checks every discount or charge on a line (cac:AllowanceCharge), on an invoice line or a credit note line, for an identifier (cbc:ID). It has no identifier. The test only checks that the element is there.

Why it matters

This is a warning. It is worth fixing to keep the file clean and to remove the warning.

How to fix it

Delete cbc:ID from the discount or charge on the line. Make sure it still has an amount and a reason, given as text or as a code. For a discount the reason is BT-139 or BT-140, for a charge BT-144 or BT-145.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the InvoiceLine AllowanceCharge ID

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-552 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026