Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-392: Leave out the identifier of the delivery party

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-392 means the delivery party has an identifier block (cac:PartyIdentification), which EN 16931 does not use there. Remove it from cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty. Use the delivery location identifier (BT-71) only for an identifier that actually identifies the place of delivery.

On this page

What it means

This rule looks at the delivery party (cac:DeliveryParty), the party the goods or services go to, in the delivery information of a UBL invoice or credit note. It checks that the party has no cac:PartyIdentification. EN 16931 lets you name the delivery party (BT-70) and identify the delivery location (BT-71), but gives the party itself no identifier.

Why it matters

EN 16931 distinguishes the delivery party's name (BT-70) from the delivery location identifier (BT-71). It does not define a separate delivery party identifier.

How to fix it

Omit cac:PartyIdentification from cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryParty in your invoice export. Use cac:Delivery/cac:DeliveryLocation/cbc:ID (BT-71) only for an identifier of the delivery location. Do not move a customer or party number there unless it also identifies that location. Recheck the exported file.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the DeliveryParty PartyIdentification

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-392 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026