Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-347: Leave out the latest delivery date

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-347 means your UBL invoice or credit note includes a latest delivery date (cac:Delivery/cbc:LatestDeliveryDate), which EN 16931 does not use. Remove it and, if needed, state the real delivery date instead.

On this page

What it means

The rule checks that the delivery section of a UBL file (cac:Delivery) has no latest delivery date (cbc:LatestDeliveryDate). In UBL that field gives the last date by which a delivery may take place, which is an agreed deadline rather than something that happened. The invoice carries the date of supply as the delivery date (BT-72), or a period as the invoicing period (BG-14).

Why it matters

EN 16931 does not use a latest delivery date in cac:Delivery/cbc:LatestDeliveryDate.

How to fix it

Clear the latest delivery date in your invoicing software and export again. If you include a delivery date (BT-72), use the day the goods or services were supplied. You can use the invoicing period (BT-73 and BT-74) to describe a supply over a period. If you build the XML yourself, delete the cbc:LatestDeliveryDate that sits directly under cac:Delivery.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the Delivery LatestDeliveryDate

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-347 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026