Skip to content

Warning

UBL-CR-142: Do not include an attention flag for the seller

In short

Warning: worth checking.

UBL-CR-142 means the seller's party data in the UBL file contains a MarkAttentionIndicator, a yes/no flag that EN 16931 does not use. It is a warning: remove the element, export the corrected file and check it again.

On this page

What it means

In a UBL invoice or credit note, the seller (BG-4) is described under cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party. This rule checks that this block has no cbc:MarkAttentionIndicator, a true or false flag in the UBL standard. EN 16931 has no field for it.

Why it matters

EN 16931 does not include this attention flag among the seller's party fields.

How to fix it

Remove cbc:MarkAttentionIndicator from cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party. If your invoicing software adds it, ask your software supplier to leave it out. Export the corrected file and check it again. The same applies to a credit note.

Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931

Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice

The rule as published

A UBL invoice should not include the AccountingSupplierParty Party MarkAttentionIndicator

Where this rule applies

Rule set Version
EN 16931 (UBL) 1.3.17
EN 16931 (UBL credit note) 1.3.17
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) 3.0.2
XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) 3.0.2
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) 2026.5
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) 2026.5
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) 2.0.3.13
SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) 2.0.3.13
France CTC (UBL invoice) 1.4.0-04
France CTC (UBL credit note) 1.4.0-04
CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 1.0.9
CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 1.0.9
Rule text from phive-rules 4.6.4.

Check your file

Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-142 still fails, and which other rules do.

Updated 6 November 2026