What it means
An item attribute (BG-32) has a name (BT-160) and a value (BT-161). This rule checks that the attribute has no value qualifier (cbc:ValueQualifier in cac:AdditionalItemProperty), a short text that qualifies the value, for example a note that it is a minimum. It looks at every line of the invoice or credit note.
Why it matters
EN 16931 does not use a separate value qualifier for an item attribute. You can include a qualification in the attribute value (BT-161) instead.
How to fix it
If the qualifier matters, put it into cbc:Value, for example "at least 12 kg". Delete cbc:ValueQualifier from cac:AdditionalItemProperty under cac:Item on every affected invoice line or credit note line. Check the corrected file again.
Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931
Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice
The rule as published
A UBL invoice should not include the InvoiceLine Item AdditionalItemProperty ValueQualifier Where this rule applies
| Rule set | Version |
|---|---|
| EN 16931 (UBL) | 1.3.17 |
| EN 16931 (UBL credit note) | 1.3.17 |
| XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) | 3.0.2 |
| XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) | 3.0.2 |
| Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) | 2026.5 |
| Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) | 2026.5 |
| SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) | 2.0.3.13 |
| SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) | 2.0.3.13 |
| France CTC (UBL invoice) | 1.4.0-04 |
| France CTC (UBL credit note) | 1.4.0-04 |
| CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 | 1.0.9 |
| CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 | 1.0.9 |
Check your file
Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-612 still fails, and which other rules do.
Related rules
- UBL-CR-613 Item attributes should not have an importance code
- UBL-CR-614 Item attributes should not have a list value
- UBL-CR-615 Item attributes should not have a usability period
- UBL-CR-616 Item attributes should not have a property group
- UBL-CR-617 Item attributes should not have a range dimension
- UBL-CR-618 Item attributes should not have a property range