What it means
The rule checks every line of the invoice, or of the credit note, for a document reference that contains a validity period (cac:ValidityPeriod). The test only looks at whether the element is there, not at what it says.
Why it matters
This is a warning. It is worth fixing if the recipient needs those dates to check or pay the invoice.
How to fix it
Remove the validity period from the line's document reference. If the recipient needs the dates, write them in the line description or in a note on the invoice. If you build the XML yourself, delete cac:ValidityPeriod under cac:DocumentReference in cac:InvoiceLine, or in cac:CreditNoteLine.
Once the file is corrected, check it again for free: Validate an invoice against EN 16931
Or fix the invoice in a form and download the corrected file, for 1 credit: Fix a rejected e-invoice
The rule as published
A UBL invoice should not include the InvoiceLine DocumentReference ValidityPeriod Where this rule applies
| Rule set | Version |
|---|---|
| EN 16931 (UBL) | 1.3.17 |
| EN 16931 (UBL credit note) | 1.3.17 |
| XRechnung 3.0 (UBL) | 3.0.2 |
| XRechnung 3.0 (UBL credit note) | 3.0.2 |
| Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (invoice) | 2026.5 |
| Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (credit note) | 2026.5 |
| SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (invoice) | 2.0.3.13 |
| SI-UBL 2.0 / NLCIUS (credit note) | 2.0.3.13 |
| France CTC (UBL invoice) | 1.4.0-04 |
| France CTC (UBL credit note) | 1.4.0-04 |
| CIUS-RO UBL Invoice 1.0.9 | 1.0.9 |
| CIUS-RO UBL Credit Note 1.0.9 | 1.0.9 |
Check your file
Drop your e-invoice to see whether UBL-CR-545 still fails, and which other rules do.
Related rules
- UBL-CR-546 A line's document reference should not name who issued it
- UBL-CR-547 A line's document reference should not hold a verification result
- UBL-CR-548 A line should not contain a pricing reference
- UBL-CR-549 A line should not name an originator party
- UBL-CR-550 A line should not carry its own delivery details
- UBL-CR-551 A line should not carry its own payment terms